From Middle Management to Production Relations Reshaping: How AI Agents Lead a New Round of Organizational Change

Yesong Cui1, *, Zhenghaoyi Cui2
1Wuxi Xuandi Ni Consulting Management Co., Ltd., Wuxi 214199, China
2University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, Australia
https://doi.org/10.71052/hkfb2025/FZKQ8926

Futurist Kevin Kelly proposed that the disruptive transformation of artificial intelligence (AI) in organizations will originate from the middle management level. Its core mechanism is AI’s replacement of traditional management functions such as planning, coordination, and reporting. Building upon Kelly’s framework and incorporating digital office practices, this paper explores the deeper proposition that the extensive embedding of AI agents is not merely a tool for process efficiency enhancement. It is a core driving force reshaping production relation. The paper first elucidates the essence of Kelly’s middle level revolution theory and analyzes how it deconstructs traditional hierarchical structures. It then introduces AI agents as proactive actors. The study demonstrates how they will redefine power distribution, transform collaboration models, and reconstruct value creation logic. This ultimately revolutionizes the relationships between people and production resources within production relations. The study argues that AI driven organizational transformation is essentially an adaptive adjustment of production relations. This adjustment culminates in a new paradigm characterized by human machine collaboration, which is a more flexible, networked, and intelligent production relationship.

References
[1] Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J. (2023) Technology, management, and productivity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(4), 3-30.
[2] Ashby, S. P. (2015) What really caused the Viking Age? The social content of raiding and exploration. Archaeological Dialogues, 22(1), 89-106.
[3] Wirtz, J. (2020) Organizational ambidexterity: cost-effective service excellence, service robots, and artificial intelligence. Organizational Dynamics, 49(3), 1-9.
[4] Almhairat, A. (2025) Bureaucracy theory revisited: Max Weber’s ideal type and its contemporary relevance in organizational science. Australian Academic & Educational Services (AAES), Business and Administrative Studies, 2(3), 16-27.
[5] Keding, C. (2021) Understanding the interplay of artificial intelligence and strategic management: four decades of research in review. Management Review Quarterly, 71(1), 91-134.
[6] Adadi, A. (2021) A survey on data‐efficient algorithms in big data era. Journal of Big Data, 8(1), 24.
[7] Merritt, H. (2017) The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Denarius, (33), 235-239.
[8] Martin, K. (2019) Ethical implications and accountability of algorithms. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 835-850.
[9] Jaiswal, R., Gupta, S., Tiwari, A. K. (2023) Dissecting the compensation conundrum: a machine learning-based prognostication of key determinants in a complex labor market. Management Decision, 61(8), 2322-2353.
[10] Raisch, S., Krakowski, S. (2021) Artificial intelligence and management: the automation-augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210.

Share and Cite
Cui, Y., Cui, Z. (2025) From Middle Management to Production Relations Reshaping: How AI Agents Lead a New Round of Organizational Change. Hong Kong Financial Bulletin, 1(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.71052/hkfb2025/FZKQ8926

Published

09/12/2025