In an era marked by shifting global economic gravity, financial multipolarity, and heightened geopolitical complexity, the pursuit of high-level financial opening-up has emerged as a pivotal strategy for nations seeking to enhance their economic resilience, integrate into global financial networks, and contribute to the evolution of the international monetary and financial architecture. This article provides a comprehensive examination of the nexus between high-level domestic financial liberalization and the cultivation of robust regional international financial cooperation. Moving beyond traditional analyses that treat opening-up merely as capital account convertibility, this study conceptualizes high-level opening-up as a multifaceted process encompassing institutional harmonization, regulatory compatibility, market infrastructure connectivity, and sustainable finance alignment. The article argues that effective regional financial cooperation serves both as a catalyst for and a stabilizer of domestic financial reforms, creating a mutually reinforcing dynamic. Through a theoretical framework integrating financial development theory, optimum currency area criteria adapted for financial integration, and institutional economics, the paper analyzes key mechanisms of cooperation including currency swap networks, cross-border payment and settlement systems, regional bond market development, and regulatory dialogue. The analysis pays particular attention to the evolving role of Asian financial cooperation, examining initiatives such as the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization, the Asian Bond Markets Initiative, and the interplay with China’s financial opening policies including the internationalization of the renminbi and the development of Shanghai as an international financial center. The article critically examines the inherent tensions in this process: Between opening and financial stability, between national sovereignty and policy coordination, and between integration with global markets and the cultivation of regional financial autonomy. It concludes by outlining a strategic roadmap for deepening regional financial cooperation in a manner that supports high-quality domestic development while contributing to a more stable, inclusive, and multipolar global financial system. The findings have significant implications for policymakers, financial regulators, and scholars concerned with the future trajectory of international finance and regional economic integration.
References
[1] Eichengreen, B., El-Ganainy, A., Esteves, R. (2022) In defense of public debt. Panoeconomicus, 69(4), 651-661.
[2] Ashenfelter, O., Engle, R. F., McFadden, D. L., Schmidt‐Hebbel, K. (2018) Globalization: contents and discontents. Contemporary Economic Policy, 36(1), 29-43.
[3] Cao, L. (2022) Dollar trap and digital currency. Chap. L. Rev., 26, 503.
[4] Moschella, M. (2017) Seeing like the IMF on capital account liberalisation. Seeing Like an International Organization, 59-76.
[5] Kashyap, A. K., Siegert, C. (2020) Financial stability considerations and monetary policy. International Journal of Central Banking, 16(1), 231-266.
[6] Jia, K. (2023) Accelerating the construction of a new development pattern with the domestic circulation as the mainstay and mutual promotion of dual circulation. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 21(2), 301-309.
[7] Kenen, P. B. (2019) The theory of optimum currency areas: an eclectic view. Essays in International Economics, 163-182.
[8] North, D. C. (2025) Institutions and the performance of economies over time. Handbook of New Institutional Economics, 25-35.
[9] Lucchetta, M. (2016) The status quo crisis: global financial governance after the 2008 meltdown. Eastern Economic Journal, 42(4), 674-675.
[10] Obstfeld, M. (2021) Trilemmas and tradeoffs: living with financial globalization. The Asian Monetary Policy Forum: Insights for Central Banking, 16-84.
[11] Kurien, J., Geoxavier, B. Y. (2020) The political economy of international finance: a revised roadmap for renminbi internationalization. Yale Journal of International Affairs, 5(2020), 163-181.
[12] Newman, A. L., Posner, E. (2017) Putting the EU in its place: policy strategies and the global regulatory context. The European Union as a Global Regulator? 96-115.
[13] Bahaj, S., Reis, R. (2022) Central bank swap lines: Evidence on the effects of the lender of last resort. The Review of Economic Studies, 89(4), 1654-1693.
[14] Chen, W. (2018) Lost in internationalization: rise of the renminbi, macroprudential policy, and global impacts. Journal of International Economic Law, 21(1), 31-66.
[15] Lee, B., Lee, Y. W. (2022) Experience, communication, and collective action: financial autonomy and capital market development in East Asia. New Political Economy, 27(5), 731-753.
[16] Hepburn, C., Stern, N., Xie, C., Zenghelis, D. (2023) China’s economic development in the new era: challenges and paths. China Finance and Economic Review, 11(2), 3-22.
[17] Subacchi, P., Oxenford, M. (2017) The “Belt and Road” initiative and the London market – the next steps in renminbi internationalization. Chatam House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Londres, 1-31.
[18] Elms, D. K. (2021) Getting RCEP across the Line. World Trade Review, 20(3), 373-380.
[19] Grimes, W. W., Kring, W. N. (2020) Institutionalizing financial cooperation in East Asia: AMRO and the future of the Chiang Mai initiative multilateralization. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 26(3), 428-448.
[20] Callaghan, M., Hubbard, P. (2016) The Asian infrastructure investment bank: multilateralism on the silk road. China Economic Journal, 9(2), 116-139.
Share and Cite
Li, G., Liu, L. (2025) High-level Financial Opening-up and Regional International Financial Cooperation: Pathways, Dynamics, and Strategic Implications. Hong Kong Financial Bulletin, 1(2), 44-51.