Since §§40-52 of Hegel’s Encyclopaedia Logic constitutes a critique of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between these sections and the relevant passages in Kant’s work. It examines the key differences and divergent perspectives between the two philosophers, identifies certain instances where Hegel misreads Kant, and thereby arrives at a deeper understanding of their respective philosophical conceptions.
References
[1] Abedi Jigeh, M. (2025) Critique Hegel’s critique of Kant’s subjective ethics through the dialectical relationship of subjective reason with nature. Theosophia Islamica, 5(2), 317-345.
[2] Cooper, S. H. (2014) The things we carry: Finding/creating the object and the analyst’s self-reflective participation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 24(6), 621-636.
[3] Levitt, H. M., Surace, F. I., Wu, M. B., Chapin, B., Hargrove, J. G., Herbitter, C., Hochman, A. L. (2022) The meaning of scientific objectivity and subjectivity: from the perspective of methodologists. Psychological Methods, 27(4), 589.
[4] Mascat, J. (2018) Hegel and the advent of modernity. A social ontology of abstraction. Radical Philosophy, (2.01), 29-46.
[5] Kim, W. H., Choi, J. H., Lee, J. S. (2018) Objectivity and subjectivity in aesthetic quality assessment of digital photographs. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 11(3), 493-506.
[6] Kannisto, T. (2018) Kant and Frege on existence. Synthese, 195(8), 3407-3432.
[7] Conant, J. (2016) Why Kant is not a Kantian. Philosophical Topics, 75-125.
[8] Guo, G. (2025) From religious representation to conceptual truth: the role of religion in Hegel’s philosophical system. Religions, 16(9), 1187.
[9] Cicatello, A. (2024) Kant and Hegel: how an objection becomes proof. Estudos Kantianos [EK], 12(1), 123-123
[10] Redding, P., Bubbio, P. D. (2014) Hegel and the ontological argument for the existence of god. Religious Studies, 50(4), 465-486.
Share and Cite
Huang, S. (2025) A Comparative Analysis of Hegel’s and Kant’s Philosophical Views – Based on §§40-52 of the Encyclopaedia Logic. Scientific Research Bulletin, 2(6), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.71052/srb2024/KKUR7675