During the period of the 15th Five-Year Plan, the development of “new quality productive forces” – and, to that end, the deepening of industry-academia-research collaboration to drive the efficient commercialization of scientific and technological achievements – is a matter of utmost urgency. This paper analyzes the constraining factors within the process of technology commercialization – including weak internal innovation capabilities within enterprises and tenuous linkages between enterprises, universities, and research institutes – which result in a mismatch between market demand and technological innovation resources, thereby leading to low conversion rates for scientific and technological achievements. It is recommended that enterprises be empowered to play the leading role throughout the entire innovation chain of industry-academia-research collaboration. It is also recommended that the organic integration of innovative resources with market demand be strengthened. It is further recommended that the innovation chain, industrial chain, capital chain, and talent chain be deeply integrated. Finally, it is recommended that the efficient commercialization of scientific and technological achievements from universities be promoted, thereby contributing to the development of new quality productive forces.
References
[1] Yayha, M. A., Samoea, R. F., Abedah, M., Fahmi, A. M., Temnikov, V. (2024) Innovation and technology management in modern enterprises. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(5), 895-908.
[2] Chen, K., Zhang, C., Feng, Z., Zhang, Y., Ning, L. (2022) Technology transfer systems and modes of national research institutes: evidence from the Chinese academy of sciences. Research Policy, 51(3), 104471.
[3] Zhu, H., Liu, R., Chen, B. (2023) The rise of specialized and innovative little giant enterprises under China’s ‘dual circulation’ development pattern: an analysis of spatial patterns and determinants. Land, 12(1), 259.
[4] Andrade-Rojas, M. G., Saldanha, T. J., Kathuria, A., Khuntia, J., Boh, W. (2024) How information technology overcomes deficiencies for innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: closed innovation vs. open innovation. Information Systems Research, 35(4), 1981-2012.
[5] Mian, S. H., Salah, B., Ameen, W., Moiduddin, K., Alkhalefah, H. (2020) Adapting universities for sustainability education in industry 4.0: channel of challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 12(15), 6100.
[6] Kreiser, P. M., Kuratko, D. F., Covin, J. G., Ireland, R. D., Hornsby, J. S. (2021) Corporate entrepreneurship strategy: extending our knowledge boundaries through configuration theory. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 739-758.
[7] Wang, F., Liu, L. (2024) Research and practice on the government-Industry-academia-research collaborative education mechanism, for the integration of economics and management majors with big data technology. Creative Education, 15(12), 2521-2543.
[8] Crammond, R. (2024) Enhancing enterprising education through industry intervention: a review of UK university measures and mechanisms. How to Enable Engagement Between Universities and Business, 49-61.
[9] Ou, Y., Luo, J. (2024) Synergistic mechanism and strategy optimization of the integration of industry and education in higher vocational education. International Conference on Frontier Computing, 479-490.
[10] Wang, X. (2025) How to promote university technology transfer? A configuration analysis based on technology, organization and environment framework. PLOS One, 20(3), e0318563.
Share and Cite
Wang, J., Zheng, D. (2025) Deepen Industry-academia-research Collaboration to Drive the Efficient Translation of Scientific and Technological Achievements. Scientific Research Bulletin, 2(1), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.71052/srb2024/BQCC1440