The Impact of AI Tool Use on Continuance Intention among Adult Learners of Chinese in the United Kingdom: An Empirical Study Based on an Integrated TAM-SDT Model

Zhuoran Zang*
School of International Chinese Language Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
*Corresponding email: 5133248@qq.com
https://doi.org/10.71052/srb2024/JCDX7497

Against the backdrop of the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence (AI) tools have gradually become important resources for adult learners of Chinese in extracurricular learning, self-directed practice, and immediate feedback. Focusing on adult learners of Chinese in the United Kingdom, this study constructs an integrated analytical framework based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT). A questionnaire survey was used to collect 210 valid responses, and construct-level structural path analysis was conducted to examine the mechanisms through which AI tool use influences continuance intention in Chinese learning. The results show that perceived ease of use has a significant positive effect on perceived usefulness, and perceived usefulness further has a significant positive effect on continuance intention. In addition, autonomy need satisfaction, competence need satisfaction, and relatedness need satisfaction all have significant positive effects on autonomous motivation, which in turn significantly promotes continuance intention. In terms of mediation effects, perceived ease of use indirectly influences continuance intention through perceived usefulness, as well as through competence need satisfaction and relatedness need satisfaction. It also exerts significant indirect effects through autonomous motivation, whereas the indirect effect of autonomy need satisfaction is not statistically significant. The findings indicate that adult learners of Chinese are jointly influenced by technological-cognitive factors and motivational-psychological factors in their willingness to continue using AI tools. The technology acceptance path plays a more direct role, while the motivational path provides complementary explanatory power. This study argues that AI tools can become sustainable resources for Chinese learning only when they are easy to use, genuinely useful, and capable of enhancing learners’ sense of competence, perceived support, and active engagement.

References
[1] Kuddus, K. (2022) Artificial intelligence in language learning: practices and prospects. Advanced Analytics and Deep Learning Models, 1-17.
[2] Alsharida, R., Hammood, M., Al-Emran, M. (2021) Mobile learning adoption: a systematic review of the Technology Acceptance Model from 2017 to 2020. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(5), 147-162.
[3] Huang, F., Zou, B. (2024) English speaking with artificial intelligence (AI): The roles of enjoyment, willingness to communicate with AI, and innovativeness. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 108355.
[4] Chen, D., Liu, W., Liu, X. (2024) What drives college students to use AI for L2 learning? Modeling the roles of self-efficacy, anxiety, and attitude based on an extended Technology Acceptance Model. Acta Psychologica, 249, 104442.
[5] Guo, K., Li, D. (2024) Understanding EFL students’ use of self-made AI chatbots as personalized writing assistance tools: a mixed methods study. System, 124, 103362.
[6] Liu, Y. L. E., Huang, Y. M. (2025) Exploring the perceptions and continuance intention of AI-based text-to-image technology in supporting design ideation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(1), 694-706.
[7] Liu, G. L., Zhao, X. (2025) A scoping review of AI-mediated informal language learning: Mapping out the terrain and identifying future directions. ReCALL, 1-20.
[8] Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., Derakhshan, A. (2024) Improving EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions. System, 121, 103254.
[9] Barrios-Beltran, D. (2025) Exploring the efficacy of ChatGPT-4 feedback in second language Spanish writing. System, 133, 103771.
[10] Liu, H., Fan, J., Xia, M. (2025) Exploring individual’s emotional and autonomous learning profiles in AI-enhanced data-driven language learning: an expanded sor perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 122, 102753.
[11] Annamalai, N., Bervell, B., Mireku, D. O., Andoh, R. P. K. (2025) Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling students’ motivation for continuous use of ChatGPT based on a modified self-determination theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100346.
[12] Mendoza, N. B., Yan, Z., King, R. B. (2023) Supporting students’ intrinsic motivation for online learning tasks: The effect of need-supportive task instructions on motivation, self-assessment, and task performance. Computers & Education, 193, 104663.
[13] Zhou, G., Ma, Q. (2025) Understanding user stickiness in GAI-IDLE platforms: insights from Self-Determination Theory. Learning and Motivation, 92, 102179.
[14] Quan, Y. (2025) The role of AI-driven feedback in fostering growth mindset and engagement: a Self-Determination Theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 92, 102192.
[15] Wang, Y., Xue, L. (2024) Using AI-driven chatbots to foster Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement: an intervention study. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 108353.
[16] Qi, A. (2025) Linking basic psychological needs, grit, and peace of mind to engagement in AI-assisted language learning: a Self-Determination Theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 92, 102178.
[17] Li, J., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., Zhai, X., Lee, V. W. (2025) The AI Motivation Scale (AIMS): a Self-Determination Theory perspective. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-22.
[18] Li, B., Tan, Y. L., Wang, C., Lowell, V. (2025) Two years of innovation: a systematic review of empirical generative AI research in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100445.
[19] Liu, G. L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, R. (2024) Examining the relationships among motivation, informal digital learning of English, and foreign language enjoyment: an explanatory mixed-method study. ReCALL, 36(1), 72-88.
[20] Dizon, G., Gold, J., Barnes, R. (2025) Technostress and English language learning in the age of generative AI. The EuroCALL Review, 32(2), 88-101.
[21] Lo, N., Chang, Y. (2025) A cross-cultural comparative study of language learning applications for self-regulated language learning: insights from Mainland China, the UK, and the US. Ampersand, 100246.

Share and Cite
Zang, Z. (2026) The Impact of AI Tool Use on Continuance Intention among Adult Learners of Chinese in the United Kingdom: An Empirical Study Based on an Integrated TAM-SDT Model. Scientific Research Bulletin, 3(2), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.71052/srb2024/JCDX7497

Published

17/06/2026