Does the Duration of Online Learning Matter? Examining Its Effect on Knowledge Mastery, Creative Thinking, and Expression across Gender and Ethnicity

Chengcheng Wu1, 2, 3, *,Xinzhu Yan1, Qianxi Zhou1
1School of Automobile & Transportation, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
2Vehicle Measurement, Control and Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610039, China
3Provincial Engineering Research Center for New Energy Vehicle Intelligent Control and Simulation Test, Chengdu 610039, China
*Corresponding email: wucc@mail.xhu.edu.cn
https://doi.org/10.71052/grb2025/GTPX4716

The COVID-19 pandemic has sped up the integration of online learning into higher education systems, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability and fairness of digital education. While existing studies often focus on short-term results, less attention has been given to how long students are engaged in online learning and its cumulative effects on their development. This study examines how the duration of online learning impacts three key educational outcomes: knowledge mastery, expressive ability, and creative thinking, and whether these impacts vary across gender and ethnic groups. Using survey data from a comprehensive Chinese university, we apply Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) and quantile regression to evaluate both average and distributional effects. Our results show that extended online learning affects student abilities differently, with female and ethnic minority students facing unique challenges. These findings emphasize the need to develop inclusive and resilient digital education systems, especially in supporting Sustainable Development Goal 4. The study adds to the growing research on education for sustainable development by demonstrating how digital learning methods intersect with social identities to influence learning paths.

References
[1] Dhawan, S. (2020) Online learning: a panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22.
[2] Sublett, C. (2020) Distant equity: the promise and pitfalls of online learning for students of color in higher education. American Council on Education, 1-6.
[3] Van Merriënboer, J. J., Kirschner, P. A. (2018) 4C/ID in the context of instructional design and the learning sciences. International Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 169-179.
[4] Tosto, S. A., Alyahya, J., Espinoza, V., McCarthy, K., Tcherni-Buzzeo, M. (2023) Online learning in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: mixed methods analysis of student views by demographic group. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100598.
[5] Heffernan, T. (2022) Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: a literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 144-154.
[6] Moulin, L., Soncin, M. (2025) Persistent impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on student outcomes in Italy. Research in Economics, 79(2), 101031.
[7] Coetzee, S. A., Schmulian, A., Janse van Rensburg, C. (2023) The use of mobile instant messaging for peer feedback in online assessments for learning. Accounting Education, 32(5), 563-577.
[8] Rana, S. (2022) Exploring the student perspectives on the barriers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(4), 1554-1566.
[9] Han, J., Geng, X., Wang, Q. (2021) Sustainable development of university EFL learners’ engagement, satisfaction, and self-efficacy in online learning environments: Chinese experiences. Sustainability, 13(21), 11655.
[10] Yu, Z. (2021) The effects of gender, educational level, and personality on online learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 14.
[11] Niu, X., Wu, X. (2022) Factors influencing vocational college students’ creativity in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: the group comparison between male and female. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 967890.
[12] Baru, M., Tenggara, W. N., Mataram, M. U. (2020) Promoting students’ autonomy through online learning media in EFL class. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 320-331.
[13] Liu, X., He, W., Zhao, L., Hong, J. C. (2021) Gender differences in self-regulated online learning during the COVID-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 752131.
[14] Fischer, C., Xu, D., Rodriguez, F., Denaro, K., Warschauer, M. (2020) Effects of course modality in summer session: enrollment patterns and student performance in face-to-face and online classes. The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100710.
[15] Xia, Y., Hu, Y., Wu, C., Yang, L., Lei, M. (2022) Challenges of online learning amid the COVID-19: college students’ perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1037311.
[16] Gu, X., Tan, Y., Wu, X., Cai, Z., Lai, Q., Cheng, M., Zhao, Q. (2022) Active versus passive strategy in online creativity training: How to best promote creativity of students with different cognitive styles? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101021.
[17] Li, Z., Lou, X., Chen, M., Li, S., Lv, C., Song, S., Li, L. (2023) Students’ online learning adaptability and their continuous usage intention across different disciplines. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-10.
[18] Chen, Y. (2021) Evaluation of teaching effect of internet of things education platform based on long-term and short-term memory network. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 31(1), 36-52.
[19] Wang, Y., Liu, Q. (2020) Effects of online teaching presence on students’ interactions and collaborative knowledge construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 370-382.
[20] Gunawardena, M., Dhanapala, K. V. (2023) Barriers to removing barriers of online learning. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 52(1), 17.
[21] Khan, A., Ghosh, S. K. (2021) Student performance analysis and prediction in classroom learning: a review of educational data mining studies. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 205-240.
[22] Paul, J., Jefferson, F. (2019) A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. face-to-face environmental science course from 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1, 7.
[23] Banihashem, S. K., Farrokhnia, M., Badali, M., Noroozi, O. (2022) The impacts of constructivist learning design and learning analytics on students’ engagement and self-regulation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(4), 442-452.
[24] Park, C., Kim, D. G. (2020) Exploring the roles of social presence and gender difference in online learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 18(2), 291-312.
[25] Hussain, M., Jones, J. M. (2021) Discrimination, diversity, and sense of belonging: experiences of students of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(1), 63.
[26] Dumford, A. D., Miller, A. L. (2018) Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452-465.
[27] Ali, W. (2020) Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: a necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16-25.
[28] Ruthotto, I., Kreth, Q., Stevens, J., Trively, C., Melkers, J. (2020) Lurking and participation in the virtual classroom: the effects of gender, race, and age among graduate students in computer science. Computers & Education, 151, 103854.
[29] Thomson, P., Jaque, S. V. (2023) Ethnicity, creative identity, creative process, and adversity in college and community samples. Journal of Creativity, 33(1), 100044.
[30] Qian, Y., Buchmann, C., Zhang, Z. (2018) Gender differences in educational adaptation of immigrant-origin youth in the United States. Demographic Research, 38, 1155-1188.
[31] Bondy, J. M., Peguero, A. A., Johnson, B. E. (2019) The children of immigrants’ bonding to school: Examining the roles of assimilation, gender, race, ethnicity, and social bonds. Urban Education, 54(4), 592-622.
[32] Gabriel, D. (2021) Race, ethnicity and gendered educational intersections. Gender and Education, 33(7), 791-797.
[33] Villa-Nicholas, M. (2018) Teaching intersectionality: pedagogical approaches for lasting impact. Education for Information, 34(2), 121-133.
[34] Harris, A., Leonardo, Z. (2018) Intersectionality, race-gender subordination, and education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 1-27.
[35] Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., Del Rosario, L. S. (2021) Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: the case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321-7338.
[36] Li, Y., Cheng, H., Qin, Q. (2025) Evaluations and improvement methods of deep learning ability in blended learning. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 21(1), 1-17.
[37] Deng, Z., Xiang, H., Tang, W., Cheng, H., Qin, Q. (2024) BP neural network-enhanced system for employment and mental health support for college students. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 20(1), 1-19.
[38] Xie, X., Siau, K., Nah, F. F. H. (2020) COVID-19 pandemic-online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 175-187.
[39] Abedini, Y. (2020) Students’ creativity in virtual vs. classroom courses on the basis of their personality traits: a prediction study. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 18(6), 525-536.
[40] Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., Krismayani, N. W., Murtini, N. M. W., Nyoman, I. B. (2022) Communication, inquiring, networking, teaching, applying (CINTA) as an effective learning model to improve students’ critical and creative thinking skills. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(12), 1337-1344.
[41] Glazier, R. A., Hamann, K., Pollock, P. H., Wilson, B. M. (2020) Age, gender, and student success: Mixing face-to-face and online courses in political science. Journal of Political Science Education, 16(2), 142-157.
[42] Sullivan, L. L., Ballen, C. J., Cotner, S. (2018) Small group gender ratios impact biology class performance and peer evaluations. PloS One, 13(4), e0195129.
[43] Reinholz, D., Johnson, E., Andrews-Larson, C., Stone-Johnstone, A., Smith, J., Mullins, B., Shah, N. (2022) When active learning is inequitable: Women’s participation predicts gender inequities in mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(3), 204-226.
[44] Ebabuye, T., Asgedom, A. (2023) A phenomenological study of the lived experience of minority students: the paradox of equitable education and school practices. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100673.
[45] Xiao, C. (2020) A novel approach of consultation on 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)-related psychological and mental problems: structured letter therapy. Psychiatry Investigation, 17(2), 175.
[46] Resch, A., Isenberg, E. (2018) How do test scores at the ceiling affect value-added estimates? Statistics and Public Policy, 5(1), 1-6.
[47] Kitchen, J. A., Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. (2022) The impact of participating in college-run STEM clubs and programs on students’ STEM career aspirations. Teachers College Record, 124(2), 117-142.
[48] Cardno, C. (2018) Policy document analysis: a practical educational leadership tool and a qualitative research method. Educational Administration: Theory & Practice, 24(4), 623-640.

Share And Cite
Wu, C., Yan, X., Zhou, Q. (2025) Does the Duration of Online Learning Matter? Examining Its Effect on Knowledge Mastery, Creative Thinking, and Expression across Gender and Ethnicity. Global Education Bulletion, 2(5), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.71052/grb2025/GTPX4716

Published

17/12/2025