Principles of Extensive Consultation, Joint Contribution, and Shared Benefits: The Concept, Practice, and Optimization Path of China’s Leadership in the Reform of the Global Governance System

Zishun Wang*, Binbin Zou
School of Journalism and Communication, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
*Corresponding email: 2126574991@qq.com
https://doi.org/10.71052/jsdh/XVGB2526

The world has entered a new period of turbulence and transformation, with the global governance system facing multiple challenges such as governance deficits, development deficits, and security deficits. Problems including insufficient representation and lagging effectiveness of existing governance mechanisms have become increasingly prominent. As an important member of the Global South, China, guided by the core concept of global governance featuring extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, has achieved fruitful practices in areas such as infrastructure connectivity. South-South cooperation, and multilateral mechanism building through the synergistic efforts of the “Belt and Road” Initiative (BRI) and the “Three Global Initiatives” – namely the Global Development Initiative (GDI), the Global Security Initiative (GSI), and the Global Civilization Initiative (GCI). Based on the triple dimensions of historical logic, theoretical logic, and realistic logic, this paper systematically elaborates on the core concepts of China’s participation in the reform of the global governance system. Combining typical cases and empirical data, it analyzes the path characteristics and effectiveness of China’s practices. In response to current challenges such as geopolitical games and differences in rules and standards, the paper proposes optimization plans including deepening the coordination of “initiatives + mechanisms”, promoting mutual recognition of rules, and strengthening risk prevention and control, to provide Chinese wisdom and practical reference for the development of the global governance system in a more fair and reasonable direction.

References
[1] Zürn, M. (2018) Contested global governance. Global Policy, 9(1), 138-145.
[2] Qamruzzaman, M., Jianguo, W., Jahan, S., Yingjun, Z. (2021) Financial innovation, human capital development, and economic growth of selected South Asian countries: an application of ARDL approach. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(3), 4032-4053.
[3] Li, X. (2021) The rise of China and its impact on world economic stratification and re-stratification. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 34(4), 530-550.
[4] Yuzhu, W., Fangfei, J. (2022) Principles of Extensive Consultation, Joint Contribution, and Shared Benefits. The Routledge Handbook of the Belt and Road, 121-125.
[5] Sell, S. K. (2023) Who governs the globe? International Organization and Global Governance, 73-86.
[6] Lei, W. (2022) Global development initiative: an international public goods to promote common development. China Economist, 17(4), 2-25.
[7] Puranen, M., Chen, J. Y. W. (2025) Chinese vision for a durable security order in an era of great power competition: the global security initiative. Competing Visions for International Order, 40-51.
[8] Buzan, B., Zhang, F. (2024) Multiple modernities in civilizational perspective: an assessment of the global civilization (s) initiative. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 17(1), 104-126.
[9] Johnston, L. A. (2019) The Belt and Road Initiative: what is in it for China? Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 6(1), 40-58.
[10] Zou, L., Shen, J. H., Zhang, J., Lee, C. C. (2022) What is the rationale behind China’s infrastructure investment under the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Economic Surveys, 36(3), 605-633.
[11] Chen, K., Cheng, H., Qin, Q. (2024) Assessing the impact of environmental accounting message disclosure quality on financing costs in high-pollution industries. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), 26(1), 1-18.
[12] Wang, R., Lee, K. E., Mokhtar, M., Goh, T. L. (2023) The transition of belt and road initiative from 1.0 to 2.0: challenges and implications of green development. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 16(3), 293-328.
[13] Walsh, P. P., Banerjee, A., Murphy, E. (2022) The UN 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Partnerships and The Sustainable Development Goals, 1-12.

Share and Cite
Wang, Z., Zou, B. (2025) Principles of Extensive Consultation, Joint Contribution, and Shared Benefits: The Concept, Practice, and Optimization Path of China’s Leadership in the Reform of the Global Governance System. Journal of Social Development and History, 1(3), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.71052/jsdh/XVGB2526

Published

14/01/2026