Against the backdrop of high-quality development in higher education in the new era, the synergistic education between ideological-political courses and specialized education has emerged as the core approach to fulfilling the fundamental task of upholding moral education and cultivating talents, as well as enhancing the quality of talent development. Grounded in the inherent logic and practical demands of integrated education via curriculum-based ideological and political education, this paper systematically dissects the current implementation status and prominent dilemmas of integrated education in colleges and universities. It constructs a four-dimensional integrated education pathway encompassing goal coordination, content coordination, teaching coordination, and team coordination. Furthermore, it designs a scientific and operable assessment framework for integrated education of curriculum-based ideological and political education, centering on five core components: evaluation concept, evaluation subject, evaluation index, evaluation method, and evaluation application. This research provides theoretical references and practical solutions for higher education institutions to deepen education and teaching reforms and elevate the quality of education.
References
[1] Chen, F., Chen, Y. (2025) Research on the construction and practice of the integration model of course-based ideological and political education and the “six-class coordination” approach. Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 46-57.
[2] Liu, W., He, C. (2022) Curriculum-based ideological and political education: research focuses and evolution. International Education Studies, 15(5), 28-35.
[3] Dong, Y. (2025) Exploration on the synergistic development path of college student party building and ideological and political education. Lecture Notes in Education, Arts, Management and Social Science, 3(6), 69-74.
[4] Yang, H. Z. (2022) Synergizing minds: Integrating ideological and political education with engineering courses for innovative pedagogy. International Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(1), 21-32.
[5] Wang, G. (2025) The integration strategy of ideological and political education for college students based on course-based ideological and political education. Educational Innovation Research, 3(2), 18-23.
[6] Li, Y., Cheng, H., Qin, Q. (2025) Evaluations and improvement methods of deep learning ability in blended learning. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 21(1), 1-17.
[7] Zhang, A., Sheng, L., Wang, J. (2024) Empirical research on curriculum-based ideological and political teaching of universities. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 13(3), 34-38.
[8] Wang, L., Liu, W. (2023) Problems and countermeasures of sharing ideas of the effectiveness of ideological and political course teaching in colleges and universities from the perspective of creative education. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 51(1), 55-63.
[9] Duan, C. (2022) Research on the path of cooperative education between professional teachers and ideological and political teachers from the perspective of curriculum ideological and political education. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 1(2), 17-22.
[10] Sung, W. (2024) Exploring the connection between university social responsibility and local sustainable development through practical teaching in higher education. Educational Administration: Theory And Practice, 30(4), 7863-7872.
[11] Faulconer, E. K., Wood, B., Griffith, J. C. (2020) Infusing humanities in STEM education: student opinions of disciplinary connections in an introductory chemistry course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 340-345.
Share and Cite
Qi, S., Wang, C., Yang, C., Li, M. (2026) Research on the Construction of a Synergistic Education and Evaluation System for Ideological and Political Education and Professional Education in Higher Education Institutions under the Background of the New Era. Global Education Bulletin, 3(1), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.71052/grb2025/HCPH5348